Friday, November 02, 2007

Hot Stove - Town Council - Top 9

Following up on the “hot stove” topic from yesterday and inspired in part by the “All in Favor” guidelines published by the Center for Public Education, let me define what I think the Franklin Town Council candidates need to provide for Franklin to address its problems and remain one of the Top 10 Ten Places to Live.

The councilors should bring to the table:
  • Good community representatives - they should be held to a higher standard as they are the role models for the community to go by. They are the ones entrusted with creating and enforcing the bylaws of the town
  • Open minded - able to examine an idea and follow a logical approach to consider multiple solutions to a problem before coming to a resolution on how to proceed
  • Good communication skills - once a process or solution has been determined, getting out to effectively communicate or educate the necessary stakeholders, explain to them in their terms and be able to move on
  • Complimentary skills - i.e. for the council to effectively work for Franklin, they should have some diversity amongst their skill sets
  • Collaborative leanings - for the council to be effective, they need to work with other boards and organizations. They should be able to approach these groups in a collaborative manner, with a win/win desire. They should deal with others in a respectful manner all the time.
  • Some public service experience - more is not always better but some is better than none


Based upon these guidelines, I offer the following choices for the top nine slots for the Town Council


Top Three: Bartlett, Doak, Mason

In my mind, there is no question about these folks. They have consistently spoken to, voted for, and worked for the best of Franklin.

Middle Three:
Evans, Feeley, LeBlanc

I don’t always agree with what they say but they bring a good deal of background and experience to the position and should continue to provide their collaborative mix of skills to the council

New Three:
Bower, Whalen, Zollo

Whalen will bring financial analysis to the role. He has proven himself with work on the Finance committee.
Zollo will bring a great deal of sanity and collaboration to this role. We clearly need to work together to solve Franklin’s problems and he has been consistent in talking that talk.
Bower will bring his “common sense” to the table in addition to the inexperienced set of eyes that a new comer will have.


What do you think? Who would you change? Why?

How much for that Ballot Question?

For only $90. a year... ... Look what Franklin can do!!

On November 6th, Franklin residents can approve the Community Preservation Act (CPA), which sets funds aside for four purposes:

1) Designation and protection of open spaces:

Setting aside land for non-residential use ultimately saves tax dollars by helping reduce the need for public expenditures on roads, sewer, water, schools, police, and fire, and improves the overall quality of life in town.
  • Lands provide for passive and active recreation to all
  • Helps purchase and preserve acreage currently threatened with development
  • Permanent land protection with Conservation Commission or local land trusts
  • Recreation improvements can be made on land purchased with CPA funds

2) Historic preservation:
  • Library improvements
  • Franklin Historic Museum improvements
  • Inventory of historic buildings, land, and monuments
  • Capital improvements to historic municipal buildings, such as schools

3) Housing that’s affordable:
  • Would provide housing for Franklin residents
  • Includes rehabilitating homes for eligible Franklin households

4) Parks and fields:

Active outdoor recreational facilities such as parks, playgrounds, skateboard parks, and athletic fields


Q: Who contributes?
A: All taxpayers, commercial and residential

Q: Who does not?
A: Senior citizens (60 and over) who earn up to the local median income ($65,920 per couple), low-income families, tenants, and tax exempt organizations such as Dean College and the Franklin Housing Authority.

Q: Who benefits?
A: We all do! Anyone who lives in or visits Franklin.

Q: How is this calculated? 
A: Currently, a sample house valued at $438,000., taxed at $8.86 per thousand (2008 rate) pays $3,880.68 in real estate taxes. The CPA provides a $100,000 exemption. Your CPA contribution would be 3% of the property taxes after the exemption, as if that house were worth $338,000. For example:


House value: $438,000.
Less $100,000. Exemption
------------------------------------------------------------------
$338,000.
x .00886 Real estate tax rate
------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 2,994.68 RE tax after exemption
x .03 CPA rate of 3%
------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 89.84 CPA contribution

Q: Can the funds ever be used for any other purpose?  
A: No. It’s the law.

If this sounds like a cost-sensitive way to preserve Franklin’s quality of life, then show your support by voting YES for Question 1, the Community Preservation Act (CPA), on November 6th!

For additional information please contact PreserveFranklin at verizon dot net

Thursday, November 01, 2007

Hot Stove Discussion Time

Now that the World Series trophy is making the rounds with some players heading for the David Letterman Show, some to the State House, and to their off season places, it’s time for the hot stove league discussions.
  • Who will get signed?
  • Will Schilling return?
  • Will Lowell return?
  • Will A-Rod appear in a Sox uniform?
  • What will the line up look like for next year?

Franklin voters actually get to do something much like the baseball hot stove league. They can pick from the 14 candidates for Town Council, the 9 that will help to work on the current budget problems. The decisions the Franklin voters make this election day will determine what our future will look like:
  • Will we go with a split tax rate or remain with a single?
  • How we will handle the library repairs?
  • How we will handle the high school renovations?
  • What will the school budget look like?
  • Will the Brick classroom survive for another year?

Your vote will determine who gets to work on the numerous opportunities facing this town.

While the baseball hot stove league fills the time from the World Series until spring training starts, Franklin voters have only until November 6th to be prepared to cast their ballot.

Michael Morton has been busy attending the candidate information sessions and writing of them in the Milford Daily News. I have seen him at each meeting I have been to, which is more than I can say of the Franklin voters. I have been quite disappointed in how few Franklin voters have appeared. We have the equivalent of an override facing the voters November 6th with the ballot question on the Community Preservation Act. No, it is not technically an override but it does raise additional funds for the town to be used for specific purposes (historic, open space, low cost housing).

To prepare for November 6th please check out the candidate profiles for

Read information on the Community Preservation Act and visit the Community Preservation Coalition web site.

CPA Overview for Franklin

The Community Preservation Act – An Overview for Franklin

Introduction

The Community Preservation Act (CPA) is a state law that allows cities and towns in Massachusetts to raise local property taxes to acquire and protect open space, preserve historic buildings and landscapes, and create and support affordable housing. It also provides significant state matching funds to participating communities.

In order for a municipality to qualify for state matching funds, its Town Meeting or City or Town Council must vote to place a property tax surcharge of up to 3 percent on the ballot. Alternatively, the CPA may be placed on the ballot through a petition signed by at least 5 percent of the city or town’s registered voters. Once the CPA is placed on the ballot, local voters must then vote to approve it. Participating cities and towns can opt out of CPA after five years and end the surcharge.

The law went into effect December 2000. To date, 127 communities across the state, over one-third of the Commonwealth’s communities, have adopted the CPA.

Determining How CPA Funds Are Spent

If Franklin approves the CPA, it will also establish a Community Preservation Committee (CPC) that will make annual recommendations to its Town Council on how the money should be spent. Town Council will then appropriate funds from the town’s Community Preservation Fund based on these recommendations. Town Council may also reject or reduce the amounts recommended by the Community Preservation Committee. The Committee is responsible for soliciting input from the community and for presenting its findings and recommendations to the public. Community Preservation Committees have open meetings to which all residents are welcome.

Each fiscal year, upon recommendation of the CPC, Town Council must spend, or set aside for future spending, the following share of annual Community Preservation Fund revenues:

  • 10 percent for open space

  • 10 percent for historic resources

  • 10 percent for community housing

Beyond these required disbursements, it is left to the residents of Franklin to decide how much of the remaining 70 percent of the funds they would like to spend on the three purposes identified above, or for recreation (ball fields, hiking or biking trails, etc). For example, a municipality could allocate the remaining 70 percent of the annual revenue to one purpose, spread it evenly among all four, or set the funds aside for future spending. Each year, the municipality can modify the spending mix for the remaining 70 percent of the fund.

Exemptions from the CPA Surcharge

Any portion of a taxpayer’s real property taxes that are already exempt are also exempt from the new CPA surcharge. In addition, Franklin’s Town Council, as part of its vote to accept the provisions of CPA, has already voted to allow the following optional exemptions to the CPA surcharge:

1) Property owned and occupied by a person who would qualify for low income housing (any family of 4 making less than $65,920) or moderate income senior housing (a person 60 or over making less than $57,680 ($65,920 for a couple)

2) The first $100,000 of taxable value of residential real estate.

Amending and Repealing the CPA

The level of the surcharge (and the optional exemptions) can be changed at any time after the surcharge is imposed, through a simple majority vote of Town Council followed by voter approval. At no time can the surcharge exceed 3 percent.

The CPA remains in effect for a minimum of five years from the date of voter approval in a municipality. After five years, it can be revoked in the same manner – legislative body acceptance or initiative petition followed by voter approval – used to approve the CPA originally.

Eligible Projects

There is a wide range of projects that could be eligible for CPA funding. Some of them, like the restoration of a historic town hall (including accessibility improvements) or the creation of new playgrounds, parks, or playing fields, may be things that the community is already planning to spend money on. By adopting the CPA, the state would pay for up to half of the cost through the CPA matching funds. CPA funds may also be used to help Franklin reach the state mandated goal of having 10% of its housing classified as affordable, by allowing the town to create affordable housing that is consistent with its character. To date, communities have spent more than $335 million on CPA projects, protecting more than 8,000 acres of open space, contributing to the creation or rehabilitation of more than 1,000 units of affordable housing, making more than 800 appropriations for the preservation of historic properties, and over 350 appropriations for the development of recreational projects.

Community Housing
Since the first communities adopted the CPA in 2001, municipalities have approved over 200 grants for housing that will create or rehabilitate more than 1,000 units of affordable housing. This funding is being targeted to municipal employees, young families, seniors and others who may live, work or attend school in a community, but find themselves increasingly priced out of the local housing market. CPA cities and towns have used the measure to fund comprehensive housing production plans, site feasibility studies, housing trusts, offices and other community-based entities to manage and develop housing, accessibility and other improvements to existing public housing, the rehabilitation of existing stock into affordable units, new construction on municipally-owned land, and roadway, septic and other infrastructure to support future housing development.

Land Protection and Public Recreation
The CPA has now protected over 8,000 acres of open space in the Commonwealth through a combination of land purchases and the acquisition of conservation and other easements to protect property in private ownership. Local communities have approved grants to acquire land surrounding municipal water supplies, to protect farms, forests, riverfront, lakes, ponds, other wetlands and wildlife habitat and to clean-up environmental contamination. In the area of recreation, the CPA has helped to create more than 150 new parks, playgrounds, and athletic fields including design and construction funds for nearly a dozen rail-trail projects. More than $2 million in CPA funding has gone to preserve existing recreational facilities that had fallen into severe disrepair.

Historic Preservation
Over 300 historic sites or resources have been preserved or restored with CPA grants since 2001. Municipalities have used this funding to revitalize aging city and town halls, libraries, schools, firehouses, commons, cemeteries, monuments, canals, bridges, lighthouses, and other municipally owned historic buildings and landscapes. CPA funded-restoration efforts include the preservation of architectural features and fabric as well as handicapped ramps and elevators, window, roof, and foundation repairs and other renovations necessary to bring historic buildings up to code. Communities have also appropriated funds for the purchase and preservation of historic properties in private or non-profit ownership such as museums, historical societies, churches, grange halls, mill buildings, commercial storefronts and streetscapes, for the completion of historical and archeological surveys, and for the purchase of preservation easements to protect significant properties from demolition or inappropriate alterations. In the 6 years since passage of the enabling law, adopting localities have approved more preservation grants than any other type of CPA funding.

Mixed Use
CPA grants may also be combined to support multiple CPA uses on a single site. For example, many initiatives have been undertaken where an historic building was adapted for affordable housing, open space protected as part of a housing plan, or all three purposes accomplished on one site.

The Cost to the Average Franklin Resident

The cost to the average Franklin taxpayer will be $90 annually, based on FY 2007 tax figures and a 3% CPA surcharge, with exemptions for the first $100,000 of taxable value of residential property and for low income families and low and moderate income seniors.

The table below shows how this cost is calculated:

Average Assessed Home Value $437,052

Minus $100,000 exemption - $100,000

Equals Net House Value Surcharged = $337,052

Times Municipal Tax Rate (per dollar) x 0.00886

Equals Amount Subject to Surcharge = $2,986

Times CPA Surcharge Rate x 3%

Amount paid toward CPA Fund $90


The Amount Franklin Would Raise

Franklin could expect to raise $1,043,339 annually for local CPA projects. Note that this amount is just the amount raised locally. The total available for local CPA projects would be much more after the state match is received each year.

The State Match

Communities that have adopted the CPA have received a 100% match each October since the program began. This high level of funding is possible because the state’s CPA Trust Fund is a dedicated revenue source that is outside of the normal legislative appropriations process and may not be redirected to other purposes besides CPA. Over time, the match percentage will decrease as more communities adopt the CPA and have to share the fixed amount of state funding, but the match should remain high for at least the next 1 to 2 years. In 2002, $17.8 million was paid out to 34 CPA cities and towns, in 2003, $27.2 million was paid out to 54 communities. In 2004, $30.8 million was paid to 61 CPA communities, and in October 2005, $46.3 million was distributed to 82 CPA communities. In October 2006, $58.6 million was distributed to 102 CPA communities, while $68.1 was distributed to 113 communities in October 2007.

This overview was prepared by the Community Preservation Coalition.

For more information, visit http://www.blogger.com/www.communitypreservation.org or call 617-367-8998.

Thanks to Kathleen Roth, Associate Director for the information.

Franklin Election 2007

My collected writing in preparation for the election on November 6th:

Milford Daily News Coverage

Reflections on the Franklin Election 11/06/07

Franklin Election Results 11/6/07
(recorded live in the field house)

Franklin School Committee results

Franklin Community Preservation Act fails

Franklin Election results

Franklin Planning Board results

Franklin Board of Health results

Franklin Town Council results

Franklin Election - November 6th

Franklin Election - November 6th

Hot stove - Planning Board

Signs discussion makes the Globe

Frequently asked questions on CPA

Hot stove - Town Council - Top 9

How much for that ballot question?

Hot stove discussion time

CPA Overview for Franklin

Is there a ballot question?

Town Council Profiles (Milford Daily News)

Planning Board, School Committee, Board of Health Profiles (Milford Daily News)

CPA Info Session

Franklin needs a bigger pie

Town Council Info Session

Audience at Info Session

Signs, Signs, Signs


Planning Board Compromises


Candidates need money answers



you can also use the Search function for "election"